Tynwald begins debate on controversial North and West Area Plan

The planning framework has prompted opposition from local authorities, legal representatives, and MHKs ahead of the vote

Tynwald is beginning a debate on the proposed Area Plan for the North and West - a framework that is expected to guide future development across large parts of the Island.

If approved, it would replace older Local Plans and the remaining sections of the 1982 Development Plan, and is scheduled to come into operation on 1 December 2025.

The plan outlines where future homes, employment land and open spaces could be developed, alongside expectations for infrastructure and environmental protection.

The plan aims to support regeneration, protect the environment, and align with wider government strategies including the Our Island Plan and the Climate Change Act 2021, and covers Ramsey and Peel, the District of Michael, and the parishes of German, Patrick, Jurby, Andreas, Bride, Ballaugh, Lezayre and Garff.

The document was first published in draft form in June 2022, followed by public consultation and an independent inquiry in July 2024. The Cabinet Office later adopted a modified version, saying it balances development with the need to safeguard communities and the landscape.

In recent weeks, opposition has grown.

Several local authorities - including Michael, Andreas, Bride, German, Jurby, Lezayre and Patrick - have jointly called for the plan to be withdrawn and reconsidered after the new Strategic Plan is complete.

Peel Commissioners issued a separate letter expressing similar concerns.

Douglas Central MHK Chris Thomas has also called for the debate to be delayed until November, arguing the public needs more time to understand its potential impact.

A separate letter from Simcocks Advocates, acting for its client Baccarat Limited, has criticised the plan’s data, process and deliverability. The firm argues that the evidence base is outdated and that key infrastructure strategies and interdepartmental input remain incomplete.

Responding to those concerns, the Cabinet Office says the plan has followed a statutory and transparent process, including more than 1,500 public representations. Minister for the Cabinet Office David Ashford says scrutiny is welcome but maintains the plan conforms to the existing Strategic Plan and provides a balanced approach.